In the past, any vaccine (proper ones) would have been pulled after 25 to 50 deaths of people of all ages, let alone children, let alone two during the clinical trials.
The regulatory agencies and “vaccine” manufacturers have consistently denied causality.
However, the temporal proximity of symptoms onset to “vaccination” date alone for the majority of reports indicates causality. It is also possible that many other deaths were not reported if they did not occur close to the “vaccination” date.
In addition, the majority of the causes of death are cardiac-related. Temporal proximity and consistency are two of the key Bradford Hill criteria to establish causality.
So, what is the stopping condition for this, the most deadly therapeutic ever released on mankind?
Why are parents even letting their children have it given that the risk of death from Covid for a healthy child is near enough zero?
In addition to the deaths, there were 1,892 other reports of serious adverse events (admission to the emergency room, hospitalisation, permanent disability, birth defects, life-threatening events).
If you are a parent, would you want your child to be one of the reports below or do you not abdicate your parental responsibility to protect your child to the public health authorities and regulators?
Having read these reports, as an “ordinary person” or an expert, how appropriate do you think it is that any of these children were subjected to this experiment?
Do you believe the experimental mRNA therapy could be responsible, like many of the parents or dismiss the possibility like many of the medical establishment?
Whatever your views on the above, what is the merit of withholding what should be headline stories from others?
There was no shortage of exaggerated tales of Covid deaths in 2020. Where are the headlines of “vaccine”-related deaths since 2021?
[Jessica Rose’s Twitter profile was suspended on Monday for sharing that a 13-year-old girl lost her life, “death is a side effect of the shots.” See images below.]