The evidence laid out in official, legal documents used to issue an Emergency Use Authorization for the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 vaccine, and a license for Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine, clearly contradicts safety information provided to the public.
How do we get information about the vaccines we take?
We get it from our doctors, our friends and the media. We hear experts like Dr. Anthony Fauci and Dr. Rochelle Walensky talk about them.
We see advertisements for the COVID-19 vaccines. And we see COVID vaccines in the news, day in and day out.
On the other hand, there exist official, legal documents that lay out precisely what the evidence showed when decisions were made to issue an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) for the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine, and a license for Pfizer’s Comirnaty vaccine.
These documents tell us what information Pfizer and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) are willing to stand by.
The documents also establish the legal requirements for issuing the EUA and license for Pfizer’s vaccines.
It may come as a shock, but what the FDA said when it issued both the EUA and the license for Pfizer’s vaccines was very different from what you heard from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the media and other sources.
Read More: Pfizer, FDA Documents Contradict Official COVID Vaccine Safety Narrative — Is This Fraud?