Validity of RT PCR test to use as a diagnostic tool for Covid-19/SARS Cov2 viral infection, mass violation of civil liberties & transformation of society
As a senior research scientist having completed my Postdoctoral studies in Stanford University in Pathology and my Masters in Virology in Imperial College London, as well having graduated with a PhD in Neurobiology from King’s College London, I am extremely concerned how the suppression of scientific evidence and the lack of open debate on the perceived Covid-19 Pandemic has culminated in fundamental changes in society, such as restrictions on freedom of travel and assembly, confinement and censorship by the mainstream media.
Public fear and hysteria surrounding the perceived Covid-19 Pandemic has been elevated to levels completely out of sync with the actual threat. Professor John Ioannidis of Stanford University, one of the world’s leading and highly cited scientist quotes an infection fatality rate (IFR) for covid of 0.00057% of similar rates to the seasonal flu . This study has not gained notoriety in the mainstream media but is published on the Word Health Organizations website.
Furthermore, the inappropriate use of the Polymerase Chain reaction (PCR) test as a diagnostic tool for Covid-19, has culminated in a dramatic upsurge of the Covid-19 infection and infection fatality rates. In fact, the inventor of the PCR test Kerry Mullis, the Noble prize winner in Chemistry reported that the PCR test should not be used for diagnosis of viral infection.
Download The Full Letter Here