Earlier this year, research was published indicating that exposure to electromagnetic radiation affects Oxidative Balance. Sources of electromagnetic radiation include activity trackers, cell phones, cell towers, utility “Smart” Meters, and more. Researchers also emphasized that vulnerable populations are more susceptible to harm. A recently published scientific review also revealed that exposure increases oxidative stress.
A newly published review “Manmade Electromagnetic Fields and Oxidative Stress—Biological Effects and Consequences for Health” published in the International Journal of Molecular Sciences by David Schuermann and Meike Mevissen funded by the Switzerland, Federal Institute of the Environment and University of Bern states there “is consistent evidence for EMF-induced ROS formation in experimental studies” after a review of the scientific evidence which concludes that “most animal and many cell studies showed increased oxidative stress caused by RF-EMF and ELF-MF. In order to estimate the risk for human health by manmade exposure, experimental studies in humans and epidemiological studies need to be considered as well.”
“In summary, indications for increased oxidative stress caused by RF-EMF and ELF-MF were reported in the majority of the animal studies and in more than half of the cell studies. Investigations in Wistar and Sprague-Dawley rats provided consistent evidence for oxidative stress occurring after RF-EMF exposure in the brain and testes and some indication of oxidative stress in the heart. Observations in Sprague-Dawley rats also seem to provide consistent evidence for oxidative stress in the liver and kidneys. In mice, oxidative stress induced by RF-EMF was predominantly demonstrated in the brain and testes, as well as in liver, kidneys, and ovaries. These observations were made with a variety of cell types, exposure times, and dosages (SAR or field strengths), within the range of the regulatory limits and recommendations. Certainly, some studies were subject to methodological uncertainties or weaknesses or are not very comprehensive regarding exposure time, dose, number, and quantitative analysis of the biomarkers used, to name a few. A trend is emerging, which becomes clear even when taking these methodological weaknesses into account, i.e., that EMF exposure, even in the low dose range, may well lead to changes in cellular oxidative balance. Organisms and cells are able to react to oxidative stress, and many observations after EMF exposure point to an adaptation after a recovery phase. Adverse conditions, such as diseases (diabetes, neurodegenerative diseases), compromise the body’s defense mechanisms, including antioxidant protection mechanisms, and individuals with such pre-existing conditions are more likely to experience health effects. The studies show that very young or old individuals can react less efficiently to oxidative stress, which of course also applies to other stressors that cause oxidative stress. Further investigations under standardized conditions are necessary to better understand and confirm these phenomena and observations.’
Read more: Scientific Review: “most animal and many cell studies showed increased oxidative stress” from RF-EMF and ELF-MF