We are living in the middle of a giant scam: “Reduce energy use, in order to cut CO2 emissions and save the planet.”
Here is the next chapter in that scam:
On January 27, 2021, the White House published Joe Biden’s Executive Order 14008, “Tackling the Climate Crisis at Home and Abroad.” 
Obviously, this document was long in the making, and Biden had no role in composing it.
Buried deep in its mind-numbing text, here is what its opponents are calling “the 30 by 30 plan” :
“The Secretary of the Interior…shall submit a report to the Task Force within 90 days of the date of this order recommending steps that the United States should take, working with State, local, Tribal, and territorial governments, agricultural and forest landowners, fishermen, and other key stakeholders, TO ACHIEVE THE GOAL OF CONSERVING AT LEAST 30 PERCENT OF OUR LANDS AND WATERS BY 2030.” (emphasis is mine)
Does this mean the federal government would suddenly and illegally OWN 30 percent of all American land? Some people think so. They believe this would be the largest theft of private property in US history.
The key is the meaning of the word “conserving” in the Executive Order.
The context of the Order makes it clear that “conserving” involves imposing massive new regulations on all this private property—conversion to “clean energy use”; employment of workers according to rules of “inclusion” and “social justice,” for example.
Conservation also implies overall reduction in energy usage, because so-called clean energy technologies the government favors—wind, solar—stand absolutely no chance of replacing oil and coal and natural gas.
Whether or not the Executive Order means the government will own 30 percent of all US land, it DOES mean the government would effectively CONTROL all that private property.
You couldn’t ask for a clearer intent to impose socialism, top-down, on America—beyond anything tried in our history.
What’s behind this plan for grand theft? An elite technocratic agenda. The aim is to lower energy production and use on the planet.
It is a means for further CONTROL of the population.
Patrick Wood  [3a], in his landmark book, Technocracy Rising [3b], traces the history of the technocracy movement, and its inception in America, early in the 20th century. Engineers wanted to replace politicians and lead civilization into a “scientifically planned” future.
One plank in their misbegotten platform? The longed-for ability to measure, in real time, moment to moment, the amount of energy being produced on the planet, and the amount of energy usage.
The means to accomplish this weren’t available in the 1930s, but they are now.
And because technocrats always want to impose their plans on the population, they now want to allocate, precisely, both energy production and usage levels.
And because these technocrats are also Globalists, bent on control and oppression and domination, they want to LOWER ENERGY PRODUCTION AND USAGE, WORLDWIDE—thereby blasting apart the lives of the world’s population.
The agenda of so-called climate change, conservation, sustainability—these are all fronts behind which technocrats operate and justify their actions. Their true goal, again, is control, through LOWERING ENERGY PRODUCTION AND USE.
Their number-one target—America.
And by the way, “conserving the land” has nothing to do with punishing corporations who actually damage the environment by grossly polluting it. When was the last time you saw a corporate CEO sent to prison for 40 years, for fouling a river with cancer-causing chemicals? Never? Correct.
We are in an energy war. We’ve been in that war for a long time.
If the federal government actually wanted to solve the energy problem, they would help kick-start—for a tiny fraction of the money they’ve poured into nuclear and oil industries—ACTUAL innovative technologies:
For two example among many, water turbines and hydrogen energy.
These alternatives are clean and abundant. They work. And furthermore, the best way to deploy them widely is through THE FREE MARKET.
Thousands of companies could, if not suppressed, launch sales of turbines and hydrogen (and other technologies) around the world—to anyone who wants to buy them.
THAT would be a genuine revolution. Government would have no need to steal massive amounts of land from private owners.
Nor would governments have to pretend their Swiss-cheese science of “climate change” is valid.
Welcome to the Energy Wars.
There is a personal dimension to this War. The entire fraudulent COVID operation—which I’ve been exposing in over 300 articles spanning the past year—is an effort to diminish and destroy the energy of the people—
—Through fear porn, masks, distancing, lockdowns, closure of businesses, bankruptcies, toxic antiviral drugs, murderous breathing ventilators, and now a toxic injection of RNA, mislabeled a “vaccine.”
Yes, your personal energy is part of this War. If the Globalist powers-that-be can soften up the global population sufficiently, through the COVID op, they believe the resistance to their overall control will be manageable.
Our task is prove them wrong.
Here is a backgrounder I wrote, in 2018, about suppressed energy technologies. It’s a smoking gun:
Five thousand inventions in limbo and under “secrecy orders” at the US Patent Office
For decades, people have been accusing the government of hiding advanced technology. Here we have a serious clue. Something in the record and on the record.
How many patents, if granted, would be game changers for planet Earth?
From FAS (Federation of American Scientists), Secrecy News, Oct. 21, 2010, “Invention Secrecy Still Going Strong,”  by Steven Aftergood:
“There were 5,135 inventions that were under secrecy orders at the end of Fiscal Year 2010, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office told Secrecy News last week. It’s a 1% rise over the year before, and the highest total in more than a decade.”
“Under the Invention Secrecy Act of 1951 [4a], patent applications on new inventions can be subject to secrecy orders restricting their publication if government agencies believe that disclosure would be ‘detrimental to the national security’.”
“The current list of technology areas that is used to screen patent applications for possible restriction under the Invention Secrecy Act is not publicly available and has been denied under the Freedom of Information Act. (An appeal is pending.)…”
“Most of the listed technology areas are closely related to military applications. But some of them range more widely.”
Thus, the 1971 list [4b] indicates that patents for solar photovoltaic generators were subject to review and possible restriction IF THE PHOTOVOLTAICS WERE MORE THAN 20% EFFFICIENT. Energy conversion systems were likewise subject to review and possible restriction IF THEY OFFERED CONVERSION EFFICIENCIES ‘IN EXCESS OF 70-80%’.” [Emphasis is mine. Read this paragraph again!!]
“One may fairly ask if disclosure of such technologies could really have been ‘detrimental to the national security,’ or whether the opposite would be closer to the truth. One may further ask what comparable advances in technology may be subject to restriction and non-disclosure today. But no answers are forthcoming, and the invention secrecy system persists with no discernible external review.”
If you’re one of those people who maintains that advanced technology is being held away from the public, here is an overall smoking gun that validates your stance.
And you can see that breakthrough energy tech, which would radically lessen the need for oil, would be on the secrecy-do-not-release list.
What else is on the list? Old Tesla patents, for example?
The US Patent Office is an official chokepoint for the “planned society”—or should we say the “restricted society.”
But this is not to say advanced technology is always shelved or scuttled. The patent applications, in suspended animation at the US Patent Office, can be quietly disclosed, for example, to government researchers engaged in black-budget projects, where the data and the research are turned to “other uses.”
Innovative inventors, who can revolutionize society for the good, incur risks if they submit their patent applications to the State. Getting trapped in limbo, while outright theft of their research occurs, is one of those risks.
On the other hand, if a giant corporation has an invention that deploys the genetic engineering of food crops, and adds millions of tons of toxic pesticides to the environment, its patent application sails through review at the Patent Office…
The Planned Civilization absolutely depends on government suppressing breakthrough technologies that would secure energy-abundance for the planet, and would also enable companies within the free market to sell those technologies and devices to all willing customers, at affordable prices.
The technocratic Planned Civilization relies on the illusion of energy-scarcity.
If that illusion were ripped away, we would see freedom and prosperity explode.
THAT is the new era. NOT the propagandized “global warming” threat; NOT the insistence on using less energy in order to “curtail carbon dioxide emissions and save the planet.”