I would like to thank you for your ‘reply’, Mr Ellwood, but we’re all a bit confused as to what it was you were actually trying to say…still, you’ve created a debate and there was an interesting interpretation around your comment from someone who used to work at GCHQ. And the comments left afterwards were also quite entertaining to read.
My own take is that the standard of your reply merely confirms our general viewpoint that standards within our Armed Services have been dropped quite deliberately in recent years by those wishing our country harm. Morale is certainly at an all-time low. I served under three colonels in the Yeomanry and not one of them would have replied in the way you did – literacy is clearly not your strongpoint. Something tells me that you’ve been promoted well beyond your capabilities. You certainly had no answers to all of the evidence I gave you.
Incidentally, my father’s first cousin’s grandfather was Lt. Gen. Sir Adrian Carton de Wiart VC (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adrian_Carton_de_Wiart). With his eyepatch and missing hand, at the tender age of six I thought I was meeting a pirate. My late father told me that the old general instructed me to always serve my country and to never give up whatever the odds are against you. Here, of course, was a man who genuinely did serve his country by taking on his country’s enemies in two world wars. Who are you actually taking on with your 77 Brigade? Oh, I forgot, your own people in peacetime! You really should be thoroughly ashamed of yourself! But never mind, you might get a campaign medal from Boris to flash on Remembrance Sunday!
You might also like to know that a cousin of mine informed me the other week that the official narrative of this ridiculous and totally contrived Covid-19 pandemic – which is steadily trashing our country’s economy to the extent that we will be forced to welcome the globalists’ ‘Great Reset’ with their completely fake ‘Green New Deal’ – is not really being believed by your ‘natural’ supporters. My cousin told me that a retired senior Army officer he knows very well actually admitted to him that he now watches David Icke’s videos to keep himself well informed about what’s really happening! And he’s certainly not happy with what he’s seeing. I think your beloved 77 Brigade, like your literacy, is not really up to the mark!
Now, let’s start to round off by looking at the official Covid figures, shall we? Yesterday, the WHO announced that approximately 800 million people globally have been affected by Coronavirus. Of that number, one million have apparently died. So, you have a one in eight hundred chance of actually dying having been tested positive. And, having been tested ‘positive’ (using that completely flawed PCR process) of those one million who died, the overwhelming number had other severe complications including old age, obesity and cancer.
In the winter of 2017/18, the UK experienced, according the the Office of National Statistics (https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/bulletins/excesswintermortalityinenglandandwales/2017to2018provisionaland2016to2017final) over 50,000 excess deaths due to influenza – did we trash the economy then? No, everything carried on almost quite normally.
Anyway, the good people are now organising. I suggest you find the time to watch this video and see how senior lawyers are organising to expose this massive scam.
. As I alluded to you earlier, if you persist in ignoring the evidence by continuing to promote complete lies and absolute deception, you will go before a jury of your peers. Let me remind you of the Common Law that would be used:
Under English law, misconductin public office is a criminal offence at common law which dates back to the 13th century.The offence carries a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. It is confined to those who are public office holders, and is committed when the office holder acts (or neglects to act) in a way that constitutes a breach of the duties of that office.The Crown Prosecution Service guidelines on this offence state that the elements of the offence are when:1. A public officer acting as such.2. Wilfully neglects to perform one’s duty and/or wilfully misconducts oneself.3. To such a degree as to amount to an abuse of the public’s trust in the office holder.4. Without reasonable excuse or justification.https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/the-7-principles-of-public-life/the-7-principles-of-public-life–2 1.1 Selflessness: Holders of public office should act solely in terms of the public interest.1.2 Integrity: Holders of public office must avoid placing themselves under any obligation to people or organisations that might try inappropriately to influence them in their work. They should not act or take decisions in order to gain financial or other material benefits for themselves, their family, or their friends. They must declare and resolve any interests and relationships.1.3 Objectivity:
Holders of public office must act and take decisions impartially, fairly and on merit, using the best evidence and without discrimination or bias.1.4 Accountability: Holders of public office are accountable to the public for their decisions and actions and must submit themselves to the scrutiny necessary to ensure this.1.5 Openness: Holders of public office should act and take decisions in an open and transparent manner. Information should not be withheld from the public unless there are clear and lawful reasons for so doing.1.6 Honesty: Holders of public office should be truthful.1.7 Leadership: Holders of public office should exhibit these principles in their own behaviour. They should actively promote and robustly support the principles and be willing to challenge poor behaviour wherever it occurs. The ball is now firmly in your court, Mr Ellwood. These emails are being kept as evidence should you persist with your present stance.
With kind regards…and it’s not too late to start a proper dialogue with sentences that actually make sense,